Skip to content
TruthOffering TruthOffering Est. 2018 · Boston
The Verified Reviews Platform — Est. 2018

We pay shoppers cash for receipt-verified product reviews — then audit every submission against carrier and payment data.

TruthOffering is the only reviews platform where authentic customer truth is the only currency that counts. No astroturfing, no anonymous star-rating theater — substantiated feedback from buyers, weighed against shipping records, published with full provenance scoring.

A still-life arrangement of receipts, a polaroid, and a magnifying glass on a desk
Exhibit A · Receipt, polaroid, and carrier data — the raw inputs of a verified review.
Lead Review · Filed Today

A 312-word review, two photo exhibits, and a Receipt-Match seal — what a verified submission actually looks like.

@verified_buyer_annek Submitted 14 March 2024 · Reviewed within 36 hours
Receipt-Match Verified
Product under review

Herman Miller Aeron — Remastered, Size B, Graphite

I sat in five "top-rated" office chairs before this one, and four of them were ranked there by people who had never unboxed one. I had. Mine arrived on a pallet with banding that took eight minutes to cut. The casters scratched my hardwood within a week — not a defect, just a thing nobody warned me about in the glossy listings.

The lumbar is genuinely different from the 2016 model; the mesh tension is firmer on the sacrum and softer on the thoracic. I am 5'9", 165 lbs, and the Size B fits like it was drawn from my measurements. The tilt limiter clicks like a camera shutter — overengineered in the best way.

Two photos attached: the caster scratch after 14 days, and the banding still on the pallet in my entryway. I was paid $48 via Cash-for-Truth to write this. You can see the receipt match in the provenance panel below. If you want a chair that disappears under you after day three, this is it. If you want a chair that looks dramatic in a Zoom call, buy a faux-leather executive seat and accept the lumbar failure down the road.

Close-up of a caster-induced scratch on hardwood flooring after 14 days of use
Exhibit 1 · Caster scratch, day 14 · Submitted by @verified_buyer_annek
A boxed office chair on a delivery pallet in a residential entryway
Exhibit 2 · Palleted delivery, day 0 · Carrier scan matched to receipt
Provenance Score
97 / 100
Receipt Match
Carrier + payment verified
Word Count
312 words
Photo Evidence
2 of 2 submitted
Reviewer Compensation
$48.00 via Cash-for-Truth
Dispute Status
None · Independent editor pass complete
Read the full verified review →
A Short Editorial · Disclosure First

Yes, our reviewers are paid. Here is why that makes the reviews more trustworthy, not less.

Every review you read on TruthOffering was written by a real shopper who bought the product with their own money — and who was then paid by us for the time it took to substantiate their feedback. We disclose the compensation amount on every published review, alongside the receipt, the carrier scan, and the photo evidence. We do not pretend our reviews are unpaid. Pretending reviews are unpaid is the original sin of the review economy.

Our 2.4 million paid reviewers since 2019 have generated disputes at a rate of 0.3 percent. The industry average for contested reviews is north of 8 percent. The reason is structural: a paid reviewer who fabricates a claim loses access to future payments, forfeits the disputed review fee, and is flagged in our Trust Index permanently. A volunteer reviewer on a five-star incentive program loses nothing by lying, because there is no downstream cost to lie about.

Cash-for-Truth is not a bribe. It is a contract — and the receipt on file is the receipt that lets us audit it.

Filed by the Standards Board · TruthOffering, Inc. · 14 March 2024

By the Numbers · Verified, Audited, Disclosed

Four oversized metrics from our 2024 transparency report.

2.4M paid verified reviewers since 2019 0.3% dispute rate, publicly reported
1.2M products reviewed across 14,800 brands as of Q4 2024
217K fraudulent reviews detected and removed in 2023 published in the Counterfeit & Fraud Dashboard
#1 in the MIT Digital Trust Index Most Trustworthy Reviews Platform, Consumer Trust Alliance 2023
Institutional Backbone · The Trust Stack

Five trust anchors. Sourced, not asserted.

  • 01

    SOC 2 Type II + ISO 27001 Certified

    Independent audits of how we handle receipt data, carrier scans, and reviewer compensation records.

  • 02

    9-Member Standards Board

    Former consumer-protection journalists with authority to override commercial partnerships. No commercial sponsor can edit a review.

  • 03

    Ranked #1 — MIT Digital Trust Index

    An independent academic measurement of platform trust signaling, conducted annually.

  • 04

    Public Truth Index

    A real-time tracking score for review-trust across the top 500 consumer brands. Updated weekly. Open to anyone.

Methodology available in full · See our verification standards →

The Methodology · Receipt-Match in Four Steps

How Receipt-Match verification works.

Every submission passes through the same four-stage pipeline before it can be published. The methodology is published; the code is not, because adversarial review-detection is a cat-and-mouse game and we are not bluffing about that either.

  1. 01

    Submit receipt + carrier data

    The reviewer uploads the order receipt and a valid carrier tracking number. The platform accepts PDF, photo, and email-forwarded receipt formats.

  2. 02

    Cross-check against shipping and payment records

    Our Receipt-Match engine reconciles the submitted data against carrier scan logs and payment processor records. Any mismatch in recipient name, address, or delivery state halts the review.

  3. 03

    Attach photo evidence

    Reviewers submit at least one photo of the product in their possession — in original packaging or in use. Photos are timestamped and geo-tagged where device permissions allow.

  4. 04

    Publish with provenance score

    A provenance score from 0 to 100 is published alongside the review, weighting receipt match, photo count, word count, and editorial audit. A score below 70 is not surfaced in search.

Receipt-Match is a proprietary system · U.S. Patent Pending · Independently audited annually